Descriptions of Scientific Revolutions

Rorty’s Failure at Redescribing Scientific Progress

Authors

  • Kyle Cavagnini

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33043/S.5.1.31-43

Keywords:

philosophy, scientific revolutions, rorty

Abstract

The twentieth century saw extended development in the philosophy of science to incorporate contemporary expansions of scientific theory and investigation. Richard Rorty was a prominent and rather controversial thinker who maintained that all progress, from social change to scientific inquiry, was achieved through the redescription of existing vocabularies. However, this theory fails to describe revolutionary scientific progress. Thomas Kuhn’s theories of paradigm change, as first described in his seminal work The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, better portray this process. I attempt to show this by applying Kuhn’s and Rorty’s views to examples of scientific progress and comparing the results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2012-09-12

How to Cite

Cavagnini, K. (2012). Descriptions of Scientific Revolutions: Rorty’s Failure at Redescribing Scientific Progress. Stance: An International Undergraduate Philosophy Journal, 5(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.33043/S.5.1.31-43

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.