Semantic Ambiguity Explained in the Framework of Cognitive Economy

Authors

  • Lixing Mida Chu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33043/S.10.1.82-93

Keywords:

philosophy, cognition, communication

Abstract

In “Context and Communication” Stephen Neale argues that the referential use of descriptions differs from the attributive use only in the pragmatics, making referential descriptions applicable to Russellian analysis. Marga Reimer disagrees with Neale’s view and argues that the difference is in the semantics, making referential descriptions semantically ambiguous. In this paper, I argue that Neale’s Modified Occam’s Razor overlooks the behavioral data of how we actually use language. I attempt to accommodate the strength of both Neale’s and Reimer’s explanations, putting them in a framework governed by the principle of cognitive economy

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2017-04-19

How to Cite

Chu, L. M. (2017). Semantic Ambiguity Explained in the Framework of Cognitive Economy. Stance: An International Undergraduate Philosophy Journal, 10(1), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.33043/S.10.1.82-93

Issue

Section

Articles