Why Structuralism Fails in Interpreting Visual Art

A Derridean Argument

Authors

  • Alexander Bak Saarland University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33043/GwDP9hx9

Keywords:

philosophy, structuralism, visual art, Derrida, frame, art criticism, Mieke Bal, Norman Bryson, Edmund Leach

Abstract

 This paper critically examines the application of structuralism as a method of interpreting visual art, with a focus on Jacques Derrida’s critique of the concept of the frame as presented in La vérité en peinture. Structuralist methodology seeks to interpret artworks through segmentation and analysis of internal relations. However, Derrida’s notion of the frame challenges the feasibility of defining clear boundaries between an artwork and its context, thereby undermining the foundational premises of structuralist interpretation. By constructing an argument based on these Derridean reflections on the frame, this study highlights the conceptual limitations
of structuralism when extended to visual arts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2025-04-14

How to Cite

Bak, A. (2025). Why Structuralism Fails in Interpreting Visual Art: A Derridean Argument. Stance: An International Undergraduate Philosophy Journal, 18(1), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.33043/GwDP9hx9