Why Structuralism Fails in Interpreting Visual Art
A Derridean Argument
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33043/GwDP9hx9Keywords:
philosophy, structuralism, visual art, Derrida, frame, art criticism, Mieke Bal, Norman Bryson, Edmund LeachAbstract
This paper critically examines the application of structuralism as a method of interpreting visual art, with a focus on Jacques Derrida’s critique of the concept of the frame as presented in La vérité en peinture. Structuralist methodology seeks to interpret artworks through segmentation and analysis of internal relations. However, Derrida’s notion of the frame challenges the feasibility of defining clear boundaries between an artwork and its context, thereby undermining the foundational premises of structuralist interpretation. By constructing an argument based on these Derridean reflections on the frame, this study highlights the conceptual limitations
of structuralism when extended to visual arts.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Alexander Bak

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Stance requires right of first publication. All other rights reside with the author. Authors are free to reuse their own articles in other publications they write or edit, and no further permission is required. The journal only requires acknowledgement of the original publication in Stance.
All articles are licensed with a Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial No-Derivatives 4.0 International license.
