Pastries to Die For
An Objection to Causal Efficacy Principles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33043/pBGvBNk7Keywords:
philosophy, vegetarianism, ethical vegetarianism , ethics, animal ethics, causal impotence , Sinnott-Armstrong, meat consumption , group ethicsAbstract
An objection to ethical vegetarianism is that the consumption of meat does not causally influence the production of meat. The objection relies on a principle called the Causal Efficacy Principle. The principle states that if an action does not directly cause harm, then that action is morally permissible. I provide a thought experiment as a counterexample to this principle, and then, I attempt to diagnose why the principle is false in terms of moral cooperation. Moral cooperation is when many people perform an action that individually does not prevent harm, but prevents harm when the group all performs the action.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Micah George

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Stance requires right of first publication. All other rights reside with the author. Authors are free to reuse their own articles in other publications they write or edit, and no further permission is required. The journal only requires acknowledgement of the original publication in Stance.
All articles are licensed with a Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial No-Derivatives 4.0 International license.
