What (Doesn't) Make an Heroic Act?

Authors

  • Jonathan Payton

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33043/S.2.1.57-60

Keywords:

philosophy, morality, Urmson, heroic act

Abstract

This paper focuses on the nature of saintly or heroic acts, which, according to J.O. Urmson, exist as a fourth, less traditional category of moral actions. According to this division, heroic acts are those, which have positive moral value, but cannot be demanded of an individual as their duty; however, this paper argues that Urmson is mistaken in his claim that a consequentialist ethical framework is the most capable of accounting for heroic acts. Furthermore, this paper claims that an Aristotelian account is the most appropriate ethical theory to consider, which could better countenance the existence of heroic acts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2019-09-09

How to Cite

Payton, J. (2019). What (Doesn’t) Make an Heroic Act?. Stance: An International Undergraduate Philosophy Journal, 2(1), 57–60. https://doi.org/10.33043/S.2.1.57-60

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.