In Defense of Quantitative Methods: Using the “Master’s Tools” to Promote Social Justice

Authors

  • Kevin Cokley University of Texas at Austin
  • Germine H. Awad University of Texas at Austin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33043/JSACP.5.2.26-41

Keywords:

Quantitative methods, Social justice, Cultural competence

Abstract

Empiricism in the form of quantitative methods has sometimes been used by researchers to thwart human welfare and social justice. Some of the ugliest moments in the history of psychology were a result of researchers using quantitative methods to legitimize and codify the prejudices of the day. This has resulted in the view that quantitative methods are antithetical to the pursuit of social justice for oppressed and marginalized groups. While the ambivalence toward quantitative methods by some is understandable given their misuse by some researchers, we argue that quantitative methods are not inherently oppressive. Quantitative methods can be liberating if used by multiculturally competent researchers and scholar-activists committed to social justice. Examples of best practices in social justice oriented quantitative research are reviewed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2013-05-01

How to Cite

Cokley, K., & Awad, G. H. (2013). In Defense of Quantitative Methods: Using the “Master’s Tools” to Promote Social Justice. Journal for Social Action in Counseling & Psychology, 5(2), 26–41. https://doi.org/10.33043/JSACP.5.2.26-41

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.