Cherny, American Politics In The Gilded Age, 1868-1900

Authors

  • H. Roger Grant Clemson University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33043/TH.24.1.53-54

Abstract

Robert Cherny, a member of the Department of History at San Francisco State University, has written a comprehensive overview of American politics from the immediate post-Civil War period to the Progressive Era. In a lively prose style, he reviews major political happenings and suggests ways to interpret this spirited period.

Cherny contends that American voters principally responded to issues of ethnicity, religion, and race. At times a strong sense of class identity influenced behavior at the polls. Generally, Republicans represented a more homogeneous coalition of voters, who embraced Protestantism, promoted moral values, and endorsed a positive expectation that government could accomplish a limited number of social and economic goals. Democrats, on the other hand, showed greater religious heterogeneity, represented by Roman Catholics in the North and old-stock Protestants in the South, but they shared common opposition to the strong use of government. As Cherny suggests, Democrats were part of the "personal liberty party," carrying on the tradition of the Jeffersonian-Jacksonians. Moreover, there existed considerable popular interest in politics, resulting at times in fierce competition between the two major parties. Any effort to enact a national party agenda was doomed, given the need to win approval from two houses of Congress and the White House. After all, it was unusual for either Democrats or Republicans to dominate this all-powerful political trinity. And Cherny cogently argues that political assumptions, strategies, and events of the Gilded Age helped to establish the essential foundation for twentieth-century politics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

1999-04-01

How to Cite

Grant, H. Roger. 1999. “Cherny, American Politics In The Gilded Age, 1868-1900”. Teaching History: A Journal of Methods 24 (1):53-54. https://doi.org/10.33043/TH.24.1.53-54.

Issue

Section

Reviews

Most read articles by the same author(s)