Barlow, Levy, & Masugi, eds., The American Founding - Essasys on the Formation of the Constitution

Authors

  • John Reilly Mount Saint Mary College

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33043/TH.16.1.52

Abstract

Prepared with the explicit intention of helping to commemorate the Bicentennial of the United States Constitution, The American Founding brings together the views of several prominent historians and political scientists on the constitution-writing process of the founding fathers. The original basis for this collection of essays was the publications of the Claremont Institute for the Study of Statesmanship and Political Philosophy and of Public Research.

These essays are based on the question "Is America the best regime sought by the philosophers of old?" In their discussion, the authors point toward a renewed scholarly interest in the concept of the "best regime" as a theme in the study of the writing of the Constitution. The historians in these essays seek to understand the founding fathers as they understood themselves and focus their attention on both particular events, such as Jack N. Rakove's essay on the Confederation Period, as well as on broader themes in political thought, as Marvin Meyers and Merrill Peterson do in their essays on James Madison and Thomas Jefferson. Political scientists, on the other hand, look for the more permanent and enduring, as well as the classical, in the contributions of the founding fathers. As Thomas G. West and Charles R. Kesseler point out, the spirit of the founding fathers was a classical one, formed by a strong knowledge of the classical authors and by a classical conception of the nature of politics. However, as Michael P. Zuchert and Edward J. Erler demonstrate, they knew such modem authors as John Locke and the concept of natural rights.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

1991-04-01

How to Cite

Reilly, John. 1991. “Barlow, Levy, & Masugi, eds., The American Founding - Essasys on the Formation of the Constitution”. Teaching History: A Journal of Methods 16 (1):52. https://doi.org/10.33043/TH.16.1.52.

Issue

Section

Reviews